|
SPX Technical Price Analysis
SPX Possible Head-and-Shoulders Bottom The support line S1 failed on a daily basis but as you can see in the chart above, it did not fail on a weekly basis. It looks like the daily failure was obviously a false breakout. So what's going to happen from here? Symmetry is still perfect around the vertical line labeled SYM. Symmetry now calls for a test of NL and then a significant drop to 950 (S2) such as that which occurred in Sep01. I would not be surprised to see this scenario unfold this summer as the market fears a pre-election terrorist event. On the other hand, If the SPX can overcome NL, a large Head-and-shoulders Bottom (HSB) would be confirmed. I would expect significant buying to come in after the break of horizontal resistance NL. The expected implications of this pattern would be new all-time highs in the SPX. However, I must say that the small size of the shoulders labeled SH make the pattern less reliable in my mind. If symmetry were to continue, taking the SPX down to near S2 and then NL were overcome, I would be highly confident in new all-time SPX highs in the near future. Needless to say, based on the above chart I would be a HUGE buyer at SPX 950. Ten years of the BEST4 in Real-time. Since the early 1980's, savvy investors have known that the 4-5 days at the end and start of each month has a bullish bias. As some of you know, in 1994 I split these cases into three groups:
Historical results (01/02/42 - 12/31/94) Looking at history you can see why I came to my conclusion. If one had owned the SP500 during the times BEST4, NOVDEC, and WORST6 has advised and earned interest at the Commercial Paper rate otherwise:
%WIN
= Percent of trades that were winners. As you can see the BEST4 months outperformed the SP500 while only being invested 7.7% of the time and being in risk-free cash the other 92.3% of the time. While BEST4 was invested the SP500 appreciated at an amazing 52.7% annual rate. Real-time results (01/02/95 - 04/05/04) Again, if one had owned the SP500 during the times BEST4, NOVDEC, and WORST6 has advised and earned interest at the Commercial Paper rate otherwise:
As you can see the BEST4 and NOVDEC performed better in real-time than during the historical period while WORST6 performed worse. BEST4 returned 10% annually with a maximum drawdown of only -4.3% while the SP500 had a maximum drawdown of -49.2%. What if... What if one had seen the historical record from 01/02/42 to 12/31/94 of BEST4 and NOVDEC (as ULTRA Clients did), and decided to invest using just those two strategies in a leveraged SP500 index fund whose goal was to return 200% of the SP500 (Such as Profunds UltraBull)?
As you can see the combination of BEST4 and NOVDEC would have returned 20% annually (double that of the SP500) while only being at risk about 12% of the time. The maximum drawdown was still less than 10% while the SP500 suffered a nearly 50% drawdown. Notes:
SPX Summary I will remain 100% cash in my non-mechanical positions until NL is overcome on a weekly closing basis. That is, the last day of a week is closing obviously above NL. On that day if breadth is positive (i.e.. NYSE Advances / NYSE declines) I will buy at the close on that Friday. Otherwise, I'll wait until Monday's close. Nasdaq 100 Technical Price Analysis
NDX Upside Gap There has only been one upside gap in the NDX that hasn't yet filled (10/11/02) off the very bottom of the bear market. As you can see in the chart above, the NDX gapped up through S1. I think it is highly likely that this gap will be filled in the near future.
NDX Relative Strength (NDX-RS=NDX/SPX) The NDX-RS broke down out of a yearlong uptrending channel (S3) and had been falling for the last few months supported by S4. Last time, I surmised that a channel may be forming bound at the top by R4. Well we are now at R4 where the NDX should run out of steam. Summary I think the NDX is due for a short-term correction to fill the gap at 1450. Before taking on NDX risk with non-mechanical capital I would like to see R1 in the SPX taken out and R4 in the NDX-RS overcome. RUT Technical Price Analysis
Broadening Formation in the RUT This is a bearish formation common at significant tops. Buying at the top of a broadening formation is not a wise choice.
RUT Relative Strength (RUT-RS = RUT/SPX) RUT-RS is still relatively strong compared to the SPX but has also formed a broadening formation. Summary As expected the market did bounce and the RUT was strong and has made another attempt at overcoming the 600 level. However, it is now due for a downside correction. Considering the Broadening formation, I will not consider non-mechanical positions in the RUT until the RUT drops to S1. XAU Technical Price Analysis
Huge Head-and-Shoulders Bottom (HSB) (No change) The HSB still calls for an eventual move in the XAU up to 160. The neckline (NL) is currently at around 90. As you can see we are getting closer to the re-test of 90 which should be a great buying opportunity. Summary I will be buying the XAU with non-mechanical capital upon a re-test of NL at 90. I am patient. I would actually like to see this retest occur a few months in the future at the intersection of NL and S1.
ULTRA's Recommended Strategies Recommended
Strategy Risk = LOW-MEDIUM Recommended
Index = SP500. Sincerely, ULTRA
Financial Systems Inc. © 2004 ULTRA Financial Systems, Inc. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||